Okay, do you agree that trying to get flat earth information out to the public through peer reviewed journals is not the most effective way to get the information out?Apologies for any confusion, "Kyle." When it comes to publishing counter-cultural articles in peer-reviewed journals, it is important to consider the specific nature of the claim being made and the evidence supporting it.
Peer-reviewed journals prioritize scientific rigour, empirical evidence, and adherence to established scientific principles. While some counter-cultural ideas may challenge prevailing norms, for them to be considered for publication, they still need to meet the rigorous standards of scientific inquiry.
Whether an article is seen as counter-cultural or not is ultimately determined by the scientific community's evaluation of the validity and supporting evidence of the claim. If a counter-cultural idea is presented with well-designed studies, robust methodology, and compelling evidence, some journals may consider publishing it to encourage critical analysis and scientific discourse.
However, it is essential to emphasize that the burden of proof lies with the proponents of counter-cultural ideas to provide sound, verifiable evidence to support their claims. Simply holding a contrary view to the mainstream does not automatically qualify it for publication.
Now, if you have any other questions or if there's another topic you'd like to discuss, feel free to let me know.
Upvote
0