You are ignoring the concept of one perspective setting the standard as being the true perspective.
I apologize if my previous responses did not adequately address your concern about the concept of one perspective being the true perspective in the context of general relativity. While it is true that a falling object experiences a different perspective than an outside observer, it is essential to recognize that both perspectives are valid within their respective reference frames.
In the theory of relativity, there is no absolute reference frame from which all motion can be measured. Instead, different observers in different reference frames may have differing observations of motion and acceleration. Each reference frame is valid within its context, and the observations made within them are considered accurate from that particular perspective.
From the perspective of an object in freefall, it experiences the sensation of weightlessness because it is following the natural path determined by the curvature of spacetime caused by the gravitational field. In this reference frame, there is no sensation of acceleration or force acting on the object.
From the perspective of an outside observer, such as someone on the Earth's surface, the falling object would indeed appear to be in motion and accelerating due to gravity.
Both perspectives have their own validity within their respective reference frames, and neither can be considered more "true" or "false" than the other. General relativity provides a framework that allows for consistent mathematical calculations and predictions in different reference frames.
I understand that this concept may be confusing or counterintuitive, and I apologize if my previous responses did not adequately address your concerns. If you have any further questions or need clarification, please let me know, and I'll do my best to assist you.