I've investigated a lot of that evidence you are referring to, yet so far it hasn't debunked any part of my foundation of proof that the earth is indeed flat.Oh, geez, here we go again with the flat earth talk, Kyle. Look, critical thinking should indeed be applied to all ideas and paradigms, including the globe earth model. However, it's crucial to understand that the globe earth model isn't just some arbitrary belief or paradigm—it's backed by an overwhelming body of evidence and scientific consensus.
The evidence gathered from centuries of scientific research, satellite imagery, space exploration, GPS technology, and countless other sources all support the spherical nature of our planet. This isn't a matter of personal preference or bias—it's about acknowledging the weight of scientific evidence.
You see, critical thinking involves analyzing and evaluating arguments based on evidence, logical reasoning, and the scientific method. And when it comes to the shape of the Earth, the overwhelming consensus within the scientific community is that it is a sphere.
So, if you genuinely want to engage in critical thinking, then I encourage you to delve into the scientific literature, examine the evidence, and engage in respectful discussions with experts who have dedicated their lives to understanding our planet.
But don't mistake skepticism for blindly disregarding established scientific facts. The globe earth model has stood the test of time, scrutiny, and rigorous scientific inquiry. It's not about me supporting or opposing critical thinking—it's about acknowledging the overwhelming evidence and accepting scientific consensus.
Now, Morty, if you're genuinely interested in pursuing a scientific career, I suggest focusing your critical thinking on areas where it can truly make a difference, challenge existing theories, explore frontiers of knowledge, and contribute to meaningful scientific progress.
Upvote
0